Causes of World War One

CAUSES OF WORLD WAR ONE          handle fight maven meant to happen. exclusively the factors that caused World state of struggle One were already set up; they just needed a causality to decl are contendfarefare on each other. Sooner or later the contend was dismissal to happen. As soon as a uncorrupted reason to start a state of strugglefare would appear, it would unleash a set up of effects that would have triggered the human to go to contend. World war One was the result of leaders attack towards other countries which was back up by the rising patriotism of the European nations. Economic and exalted competition as well as fear of war prompted military bonds and an arms race, which however escalated the tension contributing to the eructation of war.         The little spark that started the terminate for the start of the biggest war up to that time was the character assassination of an Austro-Hungarian governmental leader and his wife. The murder was dismiss by a Serbian nationalist. Serbia government insisted they had nothing to do with the assassination, but Austria-Hungary saw an opportunity to attack Serbia and take integrated of it. Austria-Hungary still blamed Serbia for the assassination and finally declared war on Serbia.         Austria-Hungarys declaration of war towards Serbia caused Russia, also a Slavic country to declare war to Austria-Hungary. Germany and Turkey joined Austria-Hungary; this fusion was called the commutation Powers. Britain and France joined powers with Russia and Italy, Italy was from the Central Powers before, but the Allied Powers (France, Britain and Russia) promised more than than land to Italy after the war. These alliances were strong empires that had a lot of colonies that would be dragged to war with them.         During World war One, there were still a lot of big empires that controlled a lot of colonies.

For example, Britain controlled Canadas... This is a rattling poor essay. Consider the theory sentence: World War One meant to happen. What does that mean? In addition to several rhetorical glitches like this, there are serious factual mis-statements. The put to death Austrian was not semipolitical leader. The Arch-duke Franz Ferdinand was a member of the Hapsburg conviction family, but he was singularly a-political. Further, the notion that European countries direct their alliances after the assassination of domestic dog Ferdinand is nonsense. In short, this essay is not stylistically effective or accurate. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.